Public Health

ObjectivesConcerns about COVID-19 were a key driver of infection-prevention behaviour during the pandemic. The aim of this study was to gain an in-depth longitudinal understanding of the type and frequency of concerns experienced throughout the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic. DesignContent analysis of qualitative descriptions provided in a prospective longitudinal online survey as part of the COVID-19 UK Public Experiences (COPE) Study. MethodAt baseline (March/April 2020), when the UK entered its first national lockdown, 11,113 adults completed the COPE survey. Follow-up surveys were conducted at 3, 12, 18 and 24 months. Participants were recruited via the HealthWise Wales research registry and social media. Baseline surveys collected demographic and health data, and all waves included an open-ended question about COVID-19 concerns. Content analysis was used to identify the type and frequency of concerns at each time point. ResultsA total of 41,564 open-text responses were coded into six categories: personal harm (n=16,353), harm to others (n=11,464), social/economic impact (n=6,433), preventing transmission (n=4,843), government/media (n=1,048), and general concerns (n=1,423). The proportion of respondents reporting any concern declined from 75.3% at baseline to 65.8% at 24 months. Over time, concerns about personal harm increased (baseline 41.8% vs. 24-months 52.7%) whereas concerns about harm to others decreased (baseline 48.5% vs. 24-months 28.6%). Concerns about harm were also expressed in relation to clinical vulnerability, lack of trust in government/media, and perceived lack of adherence by others. These were balanced against concerns about wider social and economic impacts of restrictions. ConclusionsPublic concerns about COVID-19 evolved substantially over the first two years of the pandemic, reflecting changing perceptions of risk and responsibility. Monitoring concerns longitudinally is vital to help guide effective communication and behavioural interventions during future pandemics.

Background: Wearing facemasks and practising social distancing slow the spread of respiratory pathogens. However, in the event of a new pandemic emerging, the willingness of populations to voluntarily adopt these behaviours is unclear. Methods: A discrete choice experiment was conducted among 2,006 UK-based adults. Participants were presented with hypothetical scenarios describing the emergence of a respiratory virus pandemic and were asked to choose when they would wear facemasks and practise social distancing. A mixed multinomial logit model was used to jointly estimate how disease severity and prevalence, uncertainty in these quantities, and individual-level characteristics influence behavioural choices. Findings: Participants were averse to facemasks and social distancing in the absence of pandemic risk. For each ten-unit increase in severity (10 additional hospitalisations/1,000 infections), the odds of always wearing a facemask outside the home increased by 15.9% (95%CI: 14.3%, 17.5%), relative to rarely/never, and the odds of avoiding all people as much as possible increased by 16.4% (14.6%, 18.2%), relative to not avoiding anyone. Greater disease prevalence, uncertainty in disease severity or disease prevalence, a university education, prior COVID-19 vaccination and non-white ethnicity were also associated with choosing to always wear facemasks and avoid all people as much as possible. The probability of participants choosing to rarely/never wear facemasks varied from 13.4% (11.9%, 14.9%) in the lowest-risk scenario to 1.4% (1.2%, 1.7%) in the highest-risk scenario. Interpretation: Perceived risks of disease and associated uncertainty drive intention of UK adults to adapt their behaviour in a future pandemic.

BackgroundAvian Influenza (AI) is a potential pandemic threat, specifically when human-to-human transmission occurs. For outbreak management testing is essential. Current knowledge on testing behaviour is mostly derived from other infectious diseases such as COVID-19. It is necessary to identify determinants of testing behaviour for AI in an early phase. Therefore, this interview study aims to identify a wide range of behavioural determinants of testing during a hypothetical human-to-human transmissible AI outbreak. MethodsSemi-structured in-depth interviews, based on the Theoretical Domains Framework, were carried out between May 2024 and February 2025. Participants were included through purposive and convenience sampling. During the interviews an animation was shown illustrating a hypothetical AI outbreak. Verbatim transcripts were thematically analysed. ResultsWe included seventeen participants (median age 44, range 20-81; 71% women) with diverse backgrounds in terms of age, gender, educational level and country of birth. We found that having the freedom to decide to test would make testing more acceptable, whereas a decreased sense of autonomy would discourage testing. Most themes included individual rather than population-level benefits as drivers of testing behaviour. These included protecting loved ones, ones own health and gaining psychological reassurance. External conditions like being unable to go to work or an event would generally encourage testing behaviour. Lower trust in governmental authorities could hamper testing behaviour. Previous experiences from the COVID-19 pandemic shaped participants answers about AI testing behaviour. ConclusionKey considerations include balancing peoples need for autonomy with the external measures imposed by employers or the government, rebuilding trust in institutions and acknowledging how prior experiences with testing may shape testing behaviour in future AI outbreaks. Further research is needed to determine how these findings can be translated into effective communication and how trust in authorities can be build.

Introduction: Socioeconomic deprivation is often associated with poorer health outcomes, but some studies suggest the opposite for Lyme disease. Here we test two hypotheses to explain this: differences in (i) local landcover of high risk habitats such as woodlands (landscape hypothesis) and (ii) outdoor recreation in such habitats (behaviour hypothesis). Methods: We analysed reported Lyme disease incidence data for 824 data zones in the city of Glasgow, UK, against deprivation rank (based on indicators relating to income, employment, health, education, crime and housing). We then tested how these relate to woodland cover and indices of urban greenspace usage (per capita and per ha of greenspace). Additionally, we measured Lyme disease hazard (density of infected ticks) in 32 greenspaces and tested relationships with deprivation, woodland and greenspace usage. Results: More advantaged data zones (data zones with low deprivation rank) had higher Lyme disease incidence. These areas had more woodland and woodland cover was positively correlated with both Lyme disease incidence and hazard. Deprivation did not correlate with greenspace usage, nor did greenspace usage correlate with Lyme disease incidence. Intensely used greenspaces had lower infected tick densities, consistent with a human disturbance effect on wildlife that carry ticks. Conclusions: Differences in woodland cover, but not outdoor recreation behaviour, can help explain our finding of higher Lyme disease incidence in more advantaged areas. However, to further test the behaviour hypothesis, we need more detailed data on outdoor recreation activity per capita both locally and in rural areas, as well data on mitigation behaviours.

Background: Mass gathering events (MGEs) are associated with several public health challenges and may cause a strain on healthcare services. Literature findings on the impact of MGEs on emergency departments (EDs) are heterogeneous. Objectives: To examine shifts in ED attendance characteristics during a major sporting tournament, namely the UEFA European Football Championship 2024 held in Germany. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study using ED data from the Emergency Department Data Registry. We compared baseline ED attendance characteristics between the tournament and the reference period, defined as two weeks before and two weeks after the tournament, and between Germany game days and non-Germany game days. Hourly attendance patterns were analysed for all Germany games using a reference range. Results: We included data from 41 EDs, totalling 253,493 attendances during the study period. A 1.57% increase in attendance was observed during the tournament compared to the reference period, with baseline characteristics remaining similar. The median daily attendance within all EDs was slightly lower on Germany game days (4066) compared to non-Germany game days (4128). Modest changes were observed in the hourly attendance on Germany game days, most notable during the last Germany game where a decrease in attendance below the reference range extended over three hours. Conclusions: The observed shifts in ED attendance were minimal, suggesting that no major changes of public health relevance occurred in ED attendance during the tournament. We highlight the utility of using ED data for monitoring and for enhancing the understanding of the public health risks and challenges associated with MGEs.

BackgroundThe emergency department (ED) serves as a critical entry point into hospital care and a sentinel indicator of health system performance. In-hospital mortality within 48 hours of ED admission represents acute care failures that are often preventable yet remain poorly characterized in sub-Saharan African (SSA) settings. This study aimed to identify the demographic, clinical, and hospital-related determinants of in-hospital mortality within 48 hours of admission to the Emergency and Urgent Care Department at the University Teaching Hospital (UTH), Lusaka, Zambia. MethodsA retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using 385 patient records from UTHs Emergency and Urgent Care Department for the year 2021. Data were extracted from the District Health Information System 2 (DHIS2) using simple random sampling. Descriptive statistics, univariate, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed using STATA 16.1 MP. Variables with p<0.20 in univariate analysis were retained for adjusted modelling. Multicollinearity was assessed via variance inflation factors (VIF <5). Model fit was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. ResultsOf 385 patients, 175 (45.5%) died within 48 hours of admission. Patients who died were older (median age 45 vs. 37.5 years, p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, three variables were independently associated with 48-hour mortality: pulse rate (aOR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.95-1.00, p = 0.036), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (aOR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.63-0.90, p = 0.002), and out-of-hours admission between 00:00-07:59 (aOR = 11.44, 95% CI: 1.19-109.96, p = 0.035). Age was a significant predictor in univariate analysis but not in the adjusted model, indicating confounding. The model demonstrated good discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.81). ConclusionsReduced pulse rate, lower GCS score at admission, and out-of-hours presentation are independent determinants of 48-hour in-hospital mortality at UTH. These findings underscore the need for enhanced vital sign monitoring protocols, targeted staffing during overnight hours, and improved risk stratification tools in resource-constrained emergency care settings. The wide confidence interval for the time-of-admission finding warrants cautious interpretation and validation in future prospective studies.

IntroductionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, incarcerated populations faced heightened risk of exposure due to healthcare barriers, restrictive environments, and pre-existing health conditions. Consequently, Correctional Officers (COs) faced increased risk of COVID-19 exposure. Given the health benefits of COVID-19 vaccination and the rise in vaccine hesitancy, this study examined the relationship between COs health beliefs and COVID-19 vaccine uptake. MethodsA health beliefs survey was administered to Massachusetts-based COs (n=118). Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection modeling and logistic regression was utilized to analyze the survey data. ResultsCOs with higher trust in vaccines and a prior positive COVID-19 test were most likely to get vaccinated voluntarily. Those with low trust in vaccines and no previous positive COVID-19 test were least likely to receive the vaccine. ConclusionDespite the severe impact of COVID-19 in correctional settings, and the evidence of vaccine efficacy against hospitalization and death, vaccine uptake among COs remains low.

BackgroundUnderstanding the underlying mechanisms for differences in vaccine uptake between migrants and non-migrants is crucial in order to design targeted interventions encouraging vaccination and to ensure vaccine-related equity. Therefore, this study examined to what extent migration-related disparities in COVID-19 vaccination were associated with psychological factors, based on the established 5C model of vaccine behaviour (Confidence, Complacency, Constraints, Calculation, Collective Responsibility). MethodsData were obtained from the German study "Corona Monitoring Nationwide - Wave 2" (RKI-SOEP-2 study), which was carried out between November 2021 and March 2022. The association between COVID-19 vaccination and migration status, while considering the psychological factors, was investigated using multivariable binary logistic regressions. A decomposition analysis (Karlson-Holm-Breen method) was conducted to examine the extent to which migration-related disparities in vaccine uptake were associated with the psychological factors of the 5C framework. ResultsMigrants were less likely to be vaccinated against COVID-19 compared to non-migrants, especially participants from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Our decomposition showed that almost two-thirds of the disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake between migrants and non-migrants were associated with the psychological factors (first-generation: 61.2%, second-generation: 64.2%). Confidence in safety of the vaccine was the most relevant factor in the 5C framework. Furthermore, the results highlighted the importance of a differentiated analysis regarding country of origin: While the 5C model accounted for only 19.4% of the difference between participants from the MENA region and non-migrants, the proportion for participants from Eastern Europe was 73.5%, suggesting that the underlying mechanisms for the lower uptake in the MENA group need further investigation. ConclusionsOverall, migration-related disparities in COVID-19 vaccination were significantly associated with differences in psychological factors of vaccine behaviour. To increase vaccine acceptance within the heterogeneous group of migrants in general, tailored and proactive health communication interventions are needed.

Objective: The study aimed to describe the challenges, best practices, and lessons learned during meningitis vaccination campaigns conducted in the context of COVID-19 in Cameroon in 2020. Results: During the prevention campaigns, 3,460 individuals were selected. All were tested before the campaign (100%). Eight cases were positive, representing a positivity rate of 0.23% (8/3,460). The campaign was carried out using a fixed strategy in health facilities and prisons and a fixed-temporary strategy in communities. Most health areas received sufficient quantities of COVID-19 equipment for some items and insufficient quantities for others. No screening was done during or after the campaign. The main difficulties encountered were compliance with social distancing and the continuous wearing of gowns. The challenges faced were the screening of actors and the use of personal protective equipment. Lessons learned: aspects related to COVID-19 impacted the speed of the campaign. Vaccination coverage ranged from 91% to 140% in prisons on the one hand, and from 35% to 112% in the health areas surrounding prisons on the other. The campaign in the context of COVID-19 was effective. Compliance with barrier measures was not optimal due to difficulties encountered with aspects such as social distancing, continuous wearing of gowns, screening of participants during and after the campaign, and insufficient personal protective equipment.

Objective: To verify the association between perceived social & emotional support and self-reported food insecurity in the United States Design: Cross-sectional secondary data analysis Setting: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data from 2024, collected via a nationwide telephone survey. Food insecurity was defined as responding always, usually, or sometimes to "During the past 12 months how often did the food that you bought not last, and you didn't have money to buy more?" Social support was measured using a BRFSS item assessing the frequency with which respondents received the social and emotional support they needed. Adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between these variables while controlling for a wide variety of demographic, socioeconomic, and health status factors. Participants: Adults (n = 190,577) aged 18-80 years old (72.3% non-Hispanic White) Results: Individuals who reported only "sometimes" receiving the social and emotional support they need were more likely to report food insecurity as compared to those who "always" receive such support (aOR = 1.75; 95% CI 1.56, 1.96). Conclusions: These findings indicate that decreased social support may put individuals at higher risk of food insecurity. Future work should seek to understand the mechanisms of this association to inform targeted policy and other interventional programs.

BackgroundWomens autonomy in healthcare decision-making has become one of the most critical yet inequitably distributed determinants of health outcomes, gender equity, and sustainable development worldwide. In Northern Nigeria, the presence of ethnic and socio-cultural inequality is frequently concealed by the aggregated statistics of a region. MethodsThis cross-sectional secondary analysis utilized the 2024 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey. The sample included 9,998 married women (15-49 years) identifying as Hausa, Fulani, or Kanuri in Northern Nigeria. Healthcare autonomy was categorized as husband/partner alone, respondent alone, or joint decision-making. Analysis included weighted descriptive statistics, Rao-Scott adjusted chi-square tests for residential associations, and complex sample multinomial logistic regression to identify multivariable correlates while adjusting for sampling weights, strata, and clusters. ResultsMean age was 30.38 years. Most participants lacked formal education (69.6%) and resided in rural areas (72.0%). Husband-only decision-making predominated (72.6%), while 22.5% reported joint and 4.9% independent autonomy. Joint decision-making was significantly higher in urban (33.3%) than rural areas (18.3%; Adjusted F=50.892, p<0.001). In adjusted models (Reference: Kanuri), Hausa and Fulani women had substantially lower odds of joint decision-making relative to husband-only outcomes. Rural residence correlated with lower odds of both independent and joint agency. Notably, wealth status was not a significant predictor after adjustment (p > 0.05). ConclusionsEthnicity and residence are robust determinants of healthcare autonomy among women in Northern Nigeria, persisting regardless of education or wealth. This "socio-cultural paradox" suggests that economic interventions alone are insufficient. Policies must complement socioeconomic approaches with culturally responsive strategies addressing household power dynamics and entrenched social norms.

Introduction: Even though state minimum wage (MW) is a policy lever that affects income and poverty and can prevent of violence, no prior study has comprehensively evaluated its impact in the United States (US). In this study, we estimated the impact of at least a $1 USD increase in state MW above the federal MW on overall, firearm, and non-firearm homicide mortality and examined its impact on racialized inequities. Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental study using controlled interrupted time series (CITS) and synthetic controlled interrupted time series (SCITS) approaches to examine immediate and sustained impact of state MW increases. We used state-month level homicide victimization mortality data from 2010-2019. Homicide victimization death was identified using International Classification of Disease codes, 10th revision. State MW data was obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Results: Demographic and social variables from intervention, never-exposed, and always-exposed states were similar to each other and representative of the total US population from all 50 states. The CITS results show that after MW increases in the intervention states, these states experienced a sustained decline of -0.22 (-0.37, -0.07) homicide victimizations/ 100,000 person-years/ year relative to the never-exposed states and -0.39 (-0.59, -0.18) relative to always-exposed states. This resulted in 5,657 fewer homicide victimization deaths in the intervention states over four years of post-MW increase period compared to the never-exposed states. SCITS results were similar to the CITS results, and the majority of sustained declines were observed in firearm-related deaths and among Black population. Conclusion: MW increase was associated with a reduction in homicide victimization rates, which were robust in multiple sensitivity analyses, more pronounced for firearm-related homicide deaths, and reduced homicide victimization inequities for Black Americans.

BackgroundPopulation ageing is accelerating, with the fastest growth occurring in low-and middle-income countries. Adequate nutrition is central to healthy ageing, yet little is known about the factors shaping dietary behaviours among older adults in rural African settings, where structural constraints may strongly influence dietary choice. This study explored the facilitators and barriers influencing the dietary choices among older adults aged 60 years and above living in rural communities of Edo Central, Nigeria. MethodsThis exploratory qualitative study was guided by the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM). Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 22 older adults. Interview transcripts were analysed thematically using NVivo 14, with findings mapped across individual, environmental, community, and policy/system levels of the SEM. ResultsFourteen subthemes were identified and organised into four overacting SEM domains. Individual drivers identified included a deep knowledge of nutrient-rich diets and a preference for natural, minimally processed foods, as well as community drivers, including cultural and traditional norms and market access, which were the facilitators. Environmental drivers, including physical and economic access, and policy/system drivers, including government policies/subsidies, food prices and inflation, were identified as the main barriers. ConclusionDietary choices among older adults in rural Nigeria are shaped predominantly by structural and food-system constraints rather than by individual knowledge alone. Policies aimed at improving nutrition in ageing populations should prioritise strengthening rural food systems, supporting smallholder agriculture, stabilising food prices, and developing targeted social protection programmes for older adults.

IntroductionFamily Constellation Therapy (FCT) has been widely disseminated in clinical, public health, and judicial settings despite persistent concerns regarding its theoretical basis, safety, and the limited availability of rigorous randomised evidence supporting its clinical use. ObjectiveThe aim of this systematic review is to assess the effects of FCT across all clinical conditions, explicitly considering both benefits and harms; and summarise the characteristics of studies and intervention settings used in randomised controlled trials of FCT. MethodsFollowing a prospectively registered protocol (CRD420251136190), we conducted a systematic search of seven databases (PubMed, EMBASE, APA PsycInfo, CENTRAL, BVS, Web of Science, and CINAHL) and grey literature (ICTRP and ProQuest database) without language or date restrictions to identify published and unpublished randomised controlled trials of FCT. Study selection, data extraction, risk of bias (RoB 2), and certainty of evidence (GRADE) were performed in duplicate. Statistical analyses followed a prospectively registered analysis plan with prespecified criteria for data pooling and for handling analytical limitations. ResultsNo reliable evidence was found to support the use of FCT for any condition across both clinical and non-clinical samples. All trials included were judged to be at high risk of bias and all comparisons were rated as very low-certainty evidence. Concerns regarding potential adverse effects were identified, and the available data was insufficient to establish the effectiveness of the intervention, precluding any clinical recommendation. ConclusionClinicians, policymakers, and consumers should reconsider adopting FCT while reliable evidence is not available.

Background: Antimicrobial resistance is the world's silent pandemic. The public knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) about antibiotic usage are strongly related to the growing problem in Nepal. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive survey was done to 263 respondents. Information on KAP regarding antibiotics, primary healthcare sources, and demography was collected through a questionnaire. To identify health literacy gaps and characteristics that contribute to improper antibiotic use, this study assessed these variables across an age group from 18 to 60 years. Descriptive statistics analysis was performed to analyze the data. Results: The majority of respondents were between the ages of 18 and 39 (85.1%), female (63.1%), and had at least a bachelor's degree (67.8%). Significant misunderstandings about antibiotics remained, even though 77.6% of respondents correctly recognized antibiotics as effective against bacteria; 44.1% incorrectly believed that antibiotics cure viral diseases, and 87.8% felt that antibiotics should be stopped right away if adverse effects develop. In practice, 52.9% acknowledged quitting antibiotics as soon as symptoms improved, despite 89.4% consulting doctors. Additionally, 43% of respondents said they have taken antibiotics without a prescription, frequently due to pharmacist recommendations (21.67%) and financial or geographical constraints. The main sources of information were doctors (11.07%) and pharmacist-doctor combinations (14.88%), yet 81.8% of respondents said they had never heard of the phrase antimicrobial resistance. Conclusion: There is a significant lack between theoretical understanding and practical application, despite the high levels of fundamental knowledge toward the prohibition of non-prescription sales. Self-medication and early withdrawal are still common inappropriate practices. It is crucial to implement focused teaching initiatives that highlight the differences between bacterial and viral diseases as well as the risks associated with leftover medicine. It is advised to use digital platforms for younger demographics and to strengthen the role of pharmacists in order to reduce AMR.

Aim: To explore RSV knowledge and awareness, RSV vaccination perceptions and acceptability, and preferences for maternal vaccine delivery and communication amongst pregnant women and mothers of infants and toddlers in England. Methods: Between July and November 2024, semi-structured qualitative interviews were performed with 30 mothers (youngest child under 2 years), two of whom were pregnant with a subsequent child. The study was conducted as a follow-on to a UK Health Security Agency survey of attitudes towards RSV vaccination amongst pregnant and post-partum women in England. Findings: Although most mothers had heard of RSV, mothers with experience in health roles were more likely to understand the potential severity of RSV in infants. Likelihood of maternal RSV acceptance was reported as high, with most mothers considering RSV vaccination as beneficial in protecting infants. Most mothers preferred a hybrid approach to vaccine communication, with information available online (e.g. through the NHS website), via written sources (e.g. NHS produced leaflet), and through talking with midwives. For convenience, most mothers preferred the option of fitting vaccinations within the antenatal midwifery appointment schedule rather than going to general practice for a separate appointment. Conclusion: To support maternal RSV vaccination decision-making and access, women need vaccine information early in pregnancy; information provision through a range of different sources (i.e. online, paper, in-person); and vaccination delivery in a convenient location (i.e. as part of antenatal appointments).

ObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of surgical hubs on the volume of surgeries, patient waiting times, and length of hospital stay for elective hip and knee replacements in the English NHS. DesignA retrospective longitudinal study using a difference-in-differences approach to compare changes in outcomes at NHS trusts that opened surgical hubs with those that did not. SettingThe study was set in the English NHS, using administrative data from NHS acute trusts providing elective hip and knee replacements between April 2014 and September 2024. ParticipantsThe study included 76 NHS trusts. The treatment group consisted of 29 trusts that opened a surgical hub for trauma and orthopaedic surgery during the study period. The control group consisted of 47 trusts that did not. 48 trusts that performed fewer than 1,000 relevant procedures over the ten-year period or that reported data for fewer than 41 of the 42 quarters in the sample period were excluded. InterventionThe phased introduction of surgical hubs dedicated to elective procedures at 29 NHS trusts between Q1 2020 and Q3 2024. Main outcome measuresThe three main outcomes were, measured at the trust-quarter level: the total number of elective primary hip and knee replacements (surgical volume), the average length of stay in hospital, and the average waiting time from being added to the waiting list to hospital admission. ResultsThe opening of a surgical hub was associated with an increase of 43.75 hip and knee replacement surgeries per quarter (95% CI: 22.22 to 65.28), which represents a 19.1% increase compared to the pre-hub mean. Length of stay was reduced by 0.32 days (95% CI: - 0.48 to -0.16), a 7.8% reduction. There was no statistically significant effect on average waiting times (-14.96 days, 95% CI: -33.11 to 3.19). ConclusionsSurgical hubs appear to be effective at increasing the number of hip and knee replacements and reducing the time patients spend in hospital. However, in this study, they did not lead to a statistically significant reduction in waiting times overall.

Background Meat processing plants in Alberta, Canada experienced among North America's largest COVID-19 outbreaks. We examined health impacts among workers by occupational hierarchy and equity-relevant characteristics. Methods This exploratory sequential mixed-methods study was guided by community-based participatory research and the PROGRESS-Plus framework. Multilingual qualitative interviews and surveys using validated instruments were conducted among meat plant workers who experienced outbreaks. Interviews were analysed using inductive-deductive thematic analysis. Multivariable logistic regression and linear regression estimated associations between occupational group, racialization, facility, and self-reported COVID-19 diagnosis, physical and mental health, and mean Everyday Discrimination Scale score. We integrated findings using joint displays. Findings Qualitative and integrated analysis of thirty-six interviews described occupational hierarchy shaping unequal protection, limited communication, constrained agency, and psychosocial harms, amplified by income insecurity and family separation. Among 187 survey respondents, compared with general labour, skilled labour (aOR 0.38; 95% CI 0.15-0.89) and management (aOR 0.13; 95% CI 0.01-0.75) had lower odds of reported COVID-19 diagnosis. Compared with Black workers, other racialized workers had lower odds of reporting fair or poor mental (aOR 0.24; 95% CI 0.09-0.58) and physical health (aOR 0.20; 95% CI 0.06-0.54). Compared with workers from the primary facility, others reported lower mean everyday discrimination scores ({beta} = -0.54; 95% CI -0.96 to -0.12). Interpretation COVID-19 harms followed workplace social hierarchies. Pandemic preparedness should combine infection-control measures with paid sick leave and income protection, multilingual communication, enforceable anti-discrimination standards, and independent reporting mechanisms. Funding Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR Application no. 469206). Keywords COVID-19, immigrant workers, migrants, essential workers, health equity, occupational health, PROGRESS Plus

IntroductionCommunity engagement is increasingly seen as essential within vaccination programming to improve uptake of vaccines, build trust and foster community ownership. Yet the goals and mechanisms of such interventions are often contested or not explicit. This article aims to address this by examining how those directly involved in implementing community engagement understand its intended aims and outcomes. We use as a case study a risk communication and community engagement (RCCE) intervention implemented by the Nigeria and Ethiopia Red Cross/Red Crescent with support from the IFRC for COVID-19 vaccination. MethodsWe conducted 41 interviews, 12 participatory workshops and citizen ethnography in Dire Dawa, Ethiopia and Kano, Nigeria including with Red Cross/Red Crescent and vaccination staff, vaccine users and community members. We explored how participants understood the RCCE interventions theory of change, including how it was expected to work, for whom, under what circumstances, and why. ResultsParticipants described RCCE activities as a mix of two-way (such as house-to-house visits) and mass approaches (such as media campaigns). These interventions were primarily seen as enhancing vaccine knowledge and countering misinformation. Key mechanisms included vaccine users willingness to act on the information provided, however this was heavily influenced by the credibility and trustworthiness of the bearers of vaccine information. While feedback mechanisms existed, communities were not involved in designing vaccination strategies. Efforts were shaped by a context with unpredictable vaccination campaigns, supply constraints and parallel RCCE efforts by community actors. ConclusionsWe show that in this theory of change messengers are more influential than the messages themselves. By developing a theory of change with our participants, we highlight the lack of clarity within the sector regarding the definition and expected impact of community engagement and reveal a gap between community engagement practice on the ground and normative goals such as co-production and dialogue. Key messagesO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABSRisk communication and community engagement (RCCE) is widely used to improve vaccination programmes, but there is limited evidence on how such interventions are expected to work, for whom, under what circumstances and why. What this study addsWe examined how those involved in implementing a Red Cross/Red Crescent and IFRC RCCE intervention in Ethiopia and Nigeria understood the aims and outcomes of this intervention. Whilst our study participants believed their main goal was to share correct vaccine information to counter rumours, we found that trust in the people who delivered the information was often more important than the information delivery itself. How this study might affect research, practice or policyOur research highlights tension between normative ideals of community engagement and how it is understood and practiced by implementors in humanitarian contexts, and underscores the need to move beyond knowledge-deficit approaches.

BackgroundSex workers struggled to adhere to isolation guidelines following COVID-19 diagnosis because of financial pressure to keep working. We co-developed and evaluated for feasibility, acceptability, and cost an intervention for promoting isolation and community-based self-monitoring for COVID-19. MethodsSex workers testing positive for COVID-19 received the following co-developed intervention: i) risk-differentiated support, including immediate hospitalization and/or treatment for serious illness, and community-based self-monitoring for those at risk of progressing to severe illness, ii) food packs lasting two weeks. Using Proctors Framework, we interviewed purposively selected health-workers and sex workers before intervention implementation (26 sex workers and 24 health workers) and during implementation (8 sex workers of whom 5 tested positive, and 5 health workers) to evaluate the intervention. We determined intervention development and implementation costs using program data. ResultsThe intervention was implemented between March-June 2023. Sex workers and health workers reported that the intervention was highly acceptable and was implemented with fidelity. Food packs were highly appreciated; participants said they promoted isolation although vulnerability to non-food financial pressures persisted. Unanticipated impacts were increased testing uptake following introduction of food packs. Self-monitoring at home was acceptable although fear of stigma prevented some participants from seeking the needed support. The cost per sex worker testing positive was $49 and $54 respectively excluding/including intervention co-development costs. ConclusionA co-developed intervention for promoting isolation and community-based self-monitoring for COVID-19 was feasible and acceptable, with costs comparing favorably with similar interventions. Addressing stigma could optimise implementation and potential for future pandemics.